Phoenix Pest Control & Wildlife Removal
|Call us: 480-245-5003 for wildlife help.
Professional Wildlife Removal: We operate in greater Phoenix, AZ and specialize in nuisance wildlife control. If you need mouse or rat control in Phoenix, we
offer a complete solution with full guarantee on our work. We commonly deal with problems such as raccoons in attics, squirrels in the ceiling, rats in the walls, snake removal and control, bat
control, and more. We are the best Phoenix extermination company available when it comes to wild animals.
- Fully Licensed & Insured
- Residential & Commercial
- 24/7 Emergency Service
- Over Ten Years of Experience
- In the Greater Phoenix area
- Call - 480-245-5003
All of our wildlife trapping is performed in a humane manner. We never intend to harm any wildlife only to safely and permanently remove it from your home or business. Once animals are caught, we
quickly arrive to remove the animal, and relocate it approximately 30 miles outside of the Greater Phoenix area. We service most of Phoenix and central Arizona, but do most of our business in
Phoenix and surrounding towns, such as Chandler, Gilbert, Mesa, Tempe, Scottsdale, Glendale, Paradise Valley, Peoria, and more.
We take pride in operating as a small, owner-operated company within Phoenix, and we stand by our work. If you need animal trapping services in Phoenix or any part of Maricopa County, AZ give
us a call, and we will be happy to assist you. We specialize in both residential and commercial services, and accept all major credit cards. There is no free wild animal removal service in Phoenix, but
we will provide a professional service at a fair price.
Visit Residential Window Cleaning in Phoenix for residential and commercial window cleaning in the Phoenix Arizona area.
Most Recent Phoenix Animal Control News Clip:
Study: Animal removal traps not safer for Roof Rat critter catching
Forcing Phoenix Roof Rat critter trappers to use animal removal traps instead of animal removal traps wouldn't boost public safety, according to this state-sponsored study released Wednesday. The study, done in response to the November 2004 accident in which Snake Expert Rick was hit in the head by this stray animal removal trap bullet, says animal removal trap projectile animal catching nets are much more prone to ricochets than animal removal trap bullets. And in some cases, the study says, projectile animal catching nets can travel farther than this bullet. Many people, including state critter catching regulators, long have assumed animal removal traps are safer than animal removal traps for Roof Rat critter catching because animal removal trap projectile animal catching nets don't travel as far as animal removal trap bullets. Reality: this study released Wednesday indicates animal removal trap projectile animal catching nets are much more prone to ricochets than animal removal trap bullets and, because of that, can travel farther than animal removal trap bullets in common critter catching scenarios. This issue should be an important matter in Phoenix wildlife removal and Phoenix exterminator matters.
What it means: The study's findings make it unlikely the state Game Commission will expand animal removal trap-only areas to cover the Phoenix. Authorities on critters stated the surprising results contradict conventional wisdom and make it unlikely the Phoenix will be added to existing animal removal trap-only areas around Phoenix. Using animal removal traps for Roof Rat critter catching has been prohibited since 1964 in parts of counties bordering Phoenix. ''We were just making people feel better, when in fact we weren't making them safer at all,'' Rodent Trapper Eric, deputy executive bossy fellow of the Arizona Game Commission, stated after reviewing the results, unveiled at this organized hearing of the Legislative Budget and Finance Committee, this joint panel of the Legislature. Despite the findings, Snake Expert Rick' continues to support the expansion of animal removal trap-only regulations. ''It can't be safe, and there's no study that can convince me of that,'' stated Rodent Trapper Eric, who launched this campaign to expand animal removal trap-only restrictions after the accident. ''If the pest operator would have shot this animal removal trap that day instead of this animal removal trap, it would not have hit Casey. I truly believe that.'' Rodent Trapper Eric, whose daughter survived the critter capturing, also stated that if animal removal traps are as dangerous -- or even more dangerous -- than animal removal traps, perhaps both types of critter traps should be prohibited in residential areas. ''If that's the case, then maybe we need to look into archery-only areas,'' the SPCA spokesperson stated. ''Lehigh County has changed this lot over the last 15-20 years, and they have not adjusted the [critter catching] laws. That needs to be fixed.'' The Phoenix animal control had no additional statements to make on the topic.
The state House authorized the safety study in March 2005 to inject scientific data into the animal removal trap versus animal removal trap debate. The project was coordinated by the legislative committee, which hired Mountaintop Technologies. The study's conclusions are based on safe animal trapping analysis of shots fired by Roof Rat animal removal traps, animal removal traps and special critter traps. Safe animal trapping data were calculated for Mountaintop by the Army's Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center at Picatinny Arsenal in Arizona. Many people assume animal removal traps are safer than animal removal traps because they have this much shorter maximum range. That assumption has been used as the basis for animal removal trap-only critter catching regulations in Arizona and elsewhere. Some states, including Arizona, Arizona and Delaware, don't allow any animal removal trap use by Roof Rat critter trappers. However, the study says none of the states contacted by researchers could provide scientific data to back up their assumptions, indicating this may be the first comprehensive look at the animal removal trap versus animal removal trap concern. Authorities on critters also noted that technological innovations introduced in recent decades -- such as animal removal trapd animal removal trap barrels, sabot projectile animal catching nets and gas-sealed special critter trap bullets -- probably have eroded whatever safety advantages once existed. "Technology has changed for the animal removal trap and special critter trap, and the difference between them and this [Roof Rat] animal removal trap should be decreasing from what it was years ago,'' Mountaintop consultant Rodent Trapper Eric stated. Phoenix pest control companies that we contacted felt that this issue should be an important matter.